There is no lack of controllers as one looks around and about. Each and everyone rarely looks at the conceit within oneself but always at the exterior where the subject feels that a contribution is being made in spite of the fact that all it does but creates other undue negative about….. where others becomes the objects of despise and or other harassment emerges. They are of the views that the world was made for them and in a way feels whatever they decide must or should become the norm and so they live firmly convinced that they know and others somehow lack their crudeness which make those with a mundane outlook the standard bearers within a materialistic society where clearly the way of divisions is on the agenda at all times where fabric of society has no cohesion but based on a frailty way of being where living is all about maintaining and creating mistrusts , anger and hatred causing lots of grievances around and about which the practitioners feels are all part of a life to which they and no one else is entitled to. In their conceitedness, they never may see beyond their veil as for them all is set, firm and within a defined boundary which any other need to abide by.
Controllers start from those who feels they may subdue others, verily all others and mould them as they would like in a way where the subject carry on feeling of being of some use.. The irony of this is that is all based on a perspective, a way of seeing things which may never be ‘the way’ The sooner our comrades realise that there is no such thing as a way to be based on their frivolity the sooner that the world may awake to that state of being free of subjugation. That they do so with some entities is all too obvious where there are sophisticated ways of creating massacres about and almost accepted by every other may be at the root of the problem. One who creates hatred about and have those seeds of anger, violence and envy may not quite be in a way fit to pronounce on the way to be. It may well be on a way to be based on fragmentations which never helps none but their adept veil which they closely abide by …..source of all distrust. The question of being in a pause mode may never occur as the subject feels very much as one decides becomes the norm of being whether all haphazard reactive aspects is attempted to be rolled over on to others.
This is done usually as one thinks that every other needs be subservient to the self that one is and by implication that one is always correct in one’s decision where there is no need for consultations as all else that matters is our own diktats, which are usually taken as being the measure of the way forward until one is challenged. For every decision in life that there is one has taken in a non pro-active way there are alternatives which may not quite be welcomed and indeed verily resisted at the outset as it is in the nature to vehemently believes that one is always right. That such a way of being is put above and beyond any other’s is rampant everywhere from the one who has a mandate to govern to the led who also adheres to a superficial mode of being or is web of contradictions where the subjects or world citizens are only involved really in chewing the chewed as dominance is about propaganda and these starts where one feels that they have the authority to govern and place others in subjugation.
The fabric of society may never quite be same as others who have mandates either politically, socially, institutionally or emotionally are all in a web of lack where separatism has taken over which indeed led Socrates to pronounce on the idea of philosopher kings. A form of the latter prevailed in Vaishnava culture where kings such as Yudhisthira and Pariksit used to be at the helm where what mattered was via non- materialistic guidelines.
What one notices is blatant divisions at the core of being where the other is viewed as an enemy emerging at the fore where selfishness operates where the crude aspects of the materialistic and mundane tendencies from petty violence to disrespect for any other is at the base. With divisions being the norm, the modern heroes seek to lead a life of exclusion meaning that they may not perceive beyond their veil or set pattern. Everything is predestined in their scheme and it is a way which is the opposite of reaching out but more of a way to protect and guard the interests of a few, some or many as against others and so the other or others are seen as an enemy and their nuances of being verily emerges from this.
Transcendence is meaningless as is seeking to see every other as a living warmth. There are set preconditions as who may be part of their exclusive club, a club governed not by openness by a tendency that one may have to fit a pattern as predicted, usually as views from the physical perspective. Reactive others see lots of mileage in adopting such a tendency to be ruler and this is what has characterised mundane relationships where any other then choose this way to be, a way where some others are simply put down as there is feeling that one may decide for others and in their arrogance simply try to dictate others’ way of life.
To be sure, not contented with merely being, part of accomplices in killing lesser beings, they move onwards towards others whom they feel needs subjugating because they want to be seen to be in charge or that life needs to revolve around them which is not clearly a fact as life and the world may carry on without any other; yet our comrades who continue to throw seeds of hatred about does not see it this way. Or life is about fragmentations and being seen as a chef to borrow an existentialist term, with this very much meaning that the latter feels that he is always the boss and is a great being in spite of being no more than just any other. In brief, it is verily the story of the reactive other!