The forces of negativism ….

That this reigns supreme almost everywhere is there for all to see. It takes over the self and the subject becomes submerged in anger, hatred with bickering emerging. That is the way of a reactionary which merely thrives on what is about as there is little creativity in actions bar that of seeings things as a per veil which puts everything around and about in boxes.
Fixation is the mode that one operate and the subject is just a victim of the reactionary temporal which is not perceived readily as and forces its ways. The point about this mode is that the categories as above also is associated with envy and from its impurities others may be affected. The victim is just a a walking contradiction of such desires based on me-ism and veil of on the petty self where there all is about the temporal or the bodily self. There is little thought placed beyond the corporeal as it is all about the me, me and me.
Aspects of reaching out is there only if it brings some adds on to the subject. The retreat is all about that inflated ego which the subject is beyond and above everything. There is a refusal in acknowledging what is about even when faced with reality. The problem of withdrawal onto the self is far too obvious. The body is the measure of everything and it is about what is there for me and where there is nothing, retreat emerges to the point of absurdity as lust has its special ways at providing rationality to the temporal which thrives on norms of negativism. That others may witness is obvious bar the subject which is veil covered to the point of merely seeing no other but what is only about oneself.
It is like being in a groove of miscomprehension where what is not is accepted as what is and what is seen as perversion. With this being so, the opposite of negative is never explored or the norms of positivism that of seeing the other as a living warmth is never there. Seen as the antithesis to whatever one stands for the vulgar prize its own ways of sadness, attachment and bitterness as being the way ahead. There is never any rapprochement except when it suits the subject. To move away from the category of causes distress about is never easy. There is a whim of atmosphere of dislike prevailing about the self which the person radiates about the self. The point about negativism is that it is an unwanted poison which if left unchecked may carry on polluting everything and everyone.
As one becomes a victim, one way of being is so dominated that it becomes the norm and one firmly believing that is the way to be. The point about separatism is that the subject never quite ask what about if every other were to adopt one’s ways. The crunch lies verily in being rational, and as may be observed it may be the case that the malady from which the subject suffers may prevent the latter from seeing any other with the obvious question being how does one bring sanity about. A challenge indeed. But the subject is never ever ready but bases one’s approach through a complicated model rather than that of simplicity with a firm process of being very simple and straightforward. The point about living is never to indulge in complications or other sophistication but lead a life free of duplicity and being frank as there is nothing to hide or trying to control. When one take the view that others are to be controlled in some ways or other that is when problems arise and again fall in the realm of the temporal and again plunges into absurdities.
How does one move away from separatism, envy, the malady of hatred and or anger with its violence and atmosphere of disgrace? To be sure, if one sticks to the realm of the temporal there may be hardly any ways at combatting this disease which left unchecked becomes a vermin awaiting its object to pounce at all times. To try and have a solution of the temporal is merely patching here and there and or managing the illness or afflictions of miseries rather than looking at the root cause to rid of this for ever. Or one needs to reflect seriously rather than doing mere patching within the temporal as the point about trying to mend the material by similar mode merely adds onto the problem.
It is verily a question of reflecting on those ideas of non negativism as a way forward where one is no longer submerged in mere afflictions of bickering through being a reactionary and or thrive on anger, hatred and envy but a question of exploring the more pro active forms which may never brings about through one’s actions and opening up to possibilities of the opposite as a start to those norms which creates discordance and instability and separatism.
To be sure, in other ways it is always left to the person to discover the path of non hatred, reaching out towards all by commitment of negating anger and or hatred through separatism and seek that which is unifying rather than divisions. A mind intent of carrying on regardless or wanting control over oneself or others may find no solace in aspects of gentleness, aversion to fault finding and or compassion for all living entities. Their approach is to seek that which is based on a prevent sense of truthfulness which is subjective and divisions rather than a rapprochement of a form we are trying to argue for. The way of negativism merely promotes a culture of being fine oneself to the exclusion of others which is fine for the exclusivist partial ways of beings. What proponents of negativism needs to do is ensure that they remain consistent and keep recreating disharmony which they fail to apprehend at all times thinking that what they promote with their vile ways is causing more and more problems in the world arena. The norm of silence and being at one with the self and others may never be apprehended but then that is the way of negativism. The point is do we also subscribe to its views which takes the what is as erroneous and the latter as what is.
Or it is a question how does make a leap forward from negativism towards positivism?