A case of deviancy observed!

One who carries a certain negative saliency always feels that they know best about and everything. That appearance of seeds of anger, hatred and distrust in every other and the false ego develops into pride, envy, arrogance, conceit , harshness … the cause of which is based on a lack of not appreciating life as it unfolds or precisely a deep ignorance on being. It is so as the subject is all concerns about primarily oneself or those based on a certain clear format taken and or adopted from the arena of the mundane where proponents merely are always on an ego trip, and where the non-me viewed as one that needs be subservient to that self that one is. There is always a kind of a struggle to superimposed one self on the other. Or the fact that the latter may not be acknowledged let alone be appreciated. The crude or brute may never witness a living warmth in the other and or indeed to pause and or reflect on extending that arm of comradeship or reaching out. It is all about that petty self which seeks to dominate and control every other as if by doing so, one would add credibility to oneself. There is nothing rewarding for any other including the subject who errs.
Rather it is a plain ego trip where the other is viewed as one to be put down perpetually and or whilst doing so, that gives rise to the subject own superficial-type prestige, where through one’s own self imposed importance at the same time try negating the other, nay any and every other. The proponent feels that whilst doing so, that it gives credibility and or adds value to to itself whilst on a mission of abnegating of the other and or others. A kind of a perverted approach is set in motion where it is seen that one through being independent totally may bring about a mode of being and to be sure an equally similar outcome as per the mode of approach. Even the most successful so called independent approach necessitates others about. A simple example may well illustrate this point.Even the fiercest dictator need others to flourish about as on their own they are reduced to nihilism. On the other hand, a most successful and authentic person equally begets cognition due to others about the self. Or without others one is a zero. There is no point that one tries to belittle , ignore or try at every attempt to annihilate the other mentally due to one’s own deficiency of being. It is a question of how does one gets out of this norm of hatred or let us say non-like or acknowledgement of the other. Sure, in the first instance to try and look deep within oneself and realise that lack of being so inherent within the self. Check out that pride, which emerge as an initial stumbling block to one’s being. The subject needs to ask is it possible to shift from this arena which has been part of the self that one is constantly absorbed in within the material and so arise above and beyond as the struggle is verily to engage on such a strategy which is around and about, may indeed permeate all aspects of the self. How may one let go of arrogance, that aspect of conceit which develops into harshness and anger as the subject fails to perceive that sense of being in each and every other. Sure all is based on ignorance, a lack of not knowing what is to be done or not to be done. The brute always revels in its self proclaimed aspect of trying to uplift its false ego whilst denigrating the other (s) about oneself. Those who takes such a negative way of being equally carries such seeds of non-warmth and feels that the only way to make sense of life is verily to imposed. Is there hope?
Unless one realises a lack or feels a need to rise over and above the self there may little that one may do. The point about being in ignorance is precisely having no clear guidance on how to proceed or rather our brute comrade never quite see that lack within the self. Without seeing that lack one may never be able to progress any further. Rather, the subject will be at the mercy of perpetuating its already negative trend. It is a question of a desire to move from that platform where one may wants to challenge oneself and the reality is that a few may indeed wish to move onwards and forwards. Or why should one , may be the outcry emerging as it has serve them so well thus far.
Or has it? One may ask. What such a kind of superficial way does is no more than attempt to adopt a strictly material norm onto everything and in doing so, one is robbed of the natural way of doing things and or things tends to get measured in a way which merely adds the superficial or mundane element onto relationships in that nothing gets done naturally as all is based on economics of being where what is taught in the process is what is there for oneself and where no such gains is to beget, the person may well withdraw contributions. And similar contributions are done not for the love of it but due to the fact that the subject gets some benefit. Or verily all becomes no more than a franchise way of being where all are measured as per the economics way of being. To be sure, whilst it may make good sense from a materialist angle where the individual may and up amassing benefits, the lack is shown in relationship which is non existent and that in itself projects a sad way to be in that one is not at peace as not some aspects of being may be measured as per economics. Or this is how authentic way of being is in that one always is engaged not to beget some thing or anything but one simply does so as a matter of doing things for its own sake or a valiant way to be which to be sure transcends materialism and trespasses unto the transcendental realm rather than a mere ritualistic monotonous aspect as the crude seeks to thrive on aspects of economics whereas the concern is to keep question the mode and mood of the way of frailty!