The seed of hatred associated with envy is a cancer which slowly may lead to one’s downfall. One has to rise above and beyond pettiness to clearly see/witness the problems of the known. Without this vision one falls in the realm of a ghetto where what matters as previously noted in other blogs…. an aspect of life which denies the ‘what is’ or that fact of life where things are never what they seemed but the vile and crude always prosper in the effort to perceive things with a certain saliency of being.
The known brings with it challenges which makes us view the world from a prejudice which nurture and or nourish the seeds of negativism; chief of which is hatred and putting oneself on a pedestal to the exclusion of some others whilst identifying with some group as if the latter is everything and the rest as having no right to be.
It is said that life is not a question of tolerance where again one sees the self to which one belongs as being better than the rest whilst the others somewhere being of inferior quality needs to be ‘tolerated’. The bourgeois spirit functions in the realm of promoting such an attitude where others are tolerated in that at the final analysis to be sure one is better and have something more and it is all a question of trying paying lip service to the lesser others as the subject from a liberal standpoint lacks quality and essence.
In its being each and every entity possesses something as equally valuable as the emphasis on this trend of enquiry is to see that every other has an element a quintessence that every other has, giving rise to a view of respect for its own sake rather than being a category that one does due to some other condition. It is never a question of either the other which requires a ‘pity’ and where one is seen usually above the other or where the subject has common denominators as opposed to the different others. The spirit of separatism and or creating divisions is ample in that a lack is seen where it perhaps may be met by some other positive discrimination albeit where the other is seen as an object to be ‘helped’ and ‘encouraged’ and sure different. Respect is never conditional unless it is of the petty form where the other seen as vibrant only due to some exploit. What is being argued herewith is that the other remains a firm being regardless of one’s in-situation. There is no need to be that or the other according to a preset standard where judgement takes place where one is either seen as a superb based on set conditions.
To be there is the natural way to be in the mode of being. Essentially this means that needs to see others as a synergy of togetherness where each begets one’s being not where one due to something anything which attracts attention. Or this a social communism where all others are given their dues just to be as part of facticity in a world where divisions reigns or is the order of the day. It is a separatism which sees multitudes forms which harness about and each are at each other’s throats whereas the issue of beingness is to see that there is a kind of differentiation within a holistic form. The problem with pettiness and the mundane is that it revels and thrives on the distractions of differences and the system always re-perpetuate itself by entangling in the latter which makes all others in competition. Such a spirit naively forces one to despair and hope and the other positive or reaching out qualities of perceiving each and everyone is almost non existent as what matters is choosing a path of contradictions which keeps each and every other entity as a separate to be ready at pouncing on the other.
What is lacking is not giving the other, any other that sense of common beingness; a form that although seen positively also suffers from a lack of real acknowledgement where the ‘not-me’ who are dissimilar either culturally and or socially or perhaps lacking a finesse which the virtue of promoting the lack may somehow makes amends. Separatism create an atmosphere of harm leading to anger and violence and it becomes a tyranny of initial struggles then of fights against each other where maintenance of the divisor spirit is set.
Games are organised to reflect this tendency and with the mind getting accustomed to a certain way of being of seeing life being fragmented; the subject believes that such form may also be readily applicable to life as well and when one does so a vicious circle emerges where such pettiness simply moves along as part of being ‘normal’ …. all of which are seen as ‘normal’ which is the idea of setting one against the other and or seeking or rejoicing at differences. The crude mind always sees such forms as part of living whilst a more accommodating synergy of being may be dismissed as lacking to witness a certain way of being which has become the norm after all.
The divisions are there not quite in the negative forms but still apparent as it suffers from appreciating that essence as all is seen from the known or what is revealed about us from the superficial where the physical and or other psychological traits are the measure of one’s being. With divisions sure will come other negative qualities and when these prosper the whole atmosphere becomes polluted and one falls down in the arena of the divisive rather than unifying culture…. where there is a consciousness of togetherness, or a way which does not create victims or a mode of separatism but indeed of witnessing an inherent beingness in each and every entity let alone just homo sapiens possess. It is that rare quality of uniqueness that one sees in the other, again any other …. Not simply confined to a particular specie but of witnessing a real grandeur of being where what matters are all in that synergy of being but surely not with attempts to create disintegration or calling others to a certain way of being but rather reflective of discovering the joy of being.