Towards a unity of being…….

That we are do not know who we are is all too obvious. The whole process of material culture is a perpetual running away from what is in that we are a minute fraction, minuscule aspect of essential quality of the whole to which one is connected whereas caught in the material realm, one tends to forget this aspect of our link and so lives in a part as opposed to the whole.
It is a clear fact that we are in effect under the control of material energy , making it very difficult to come to terms with life as it is. Running here, there and everywhere, one clings to that independent aspect, that fragmented being which somehow makes one think that the latter is unique and is in competition with the other, against one another and every other. The process of life is thus so shaped that there is always a tendency to ignore that one indeed is part of a whole reality. Material culture promotes a way of life which seeks to ignore that synergy preferring to instead abide by another realm which breaks down everything into bits and particles where what is encouraged verily is a part of being where the minuscule independence is prized over and above any link or being interconnected. All aspects of life is so framed that we exist in a mode which effectively promotes that one is a lone self, and that each and every aspect is seen verily from a fragmented way of being. Whether it is social, cultural, sports or organisation, they say that that truly one needs to belong to some this, or other form. It is a question of a potent fierce competition which is about which makes one a success. That one runs after such ways are all too obvious as we open our eyes and perceive things in a non transcendental manner. The problem with this all too obvious. One is a victim of the way of division.
Associated with all that of course there is no real understanding of who or what one is. With this being so, the how of being also becomes problematic. Rather, the subject espouses the culture of fragment way and so there is no reflection. It is all a puppet way of being where one simply is a victim of what is there in the mode of acceptance what is thrown about with one merely living the way as set about by those bourgeois standard….
There is a running away but in a way to reflect on the what of one’s being. A real perception of such an understanding may move one into an authentic mode of being where the idea of separation is negated where one truly begins to see sense in a being of a way which is all about a reality appreciated for what one is.
An arrogance in that the miniature controller feels that whatever is decided becomes the norm; that norm which makes one a being of the starting position of everything. There is a failure to comprehend one’s guest aspect in a world which has always been there and seen away countless of so-called miniature controllers. With this being so, it is incumbent that one question everything about us. There is no need to close the self to the whole as is about us and take shelter of the and appreciate one’s status in life, in the world and takes comfort that all one finally is, simply a part and not the whole.
Such an awareness may prize one away from arrogance, hatred, envy, and takes one instead towards humility, care and appreciation of any other about oneself. Or that one begets one being from that su, total of beings rather than trying to keep imposing oneself on others where one may be a subject of confinement as opposed to being seen as one who projects virtue.
To be sure, it is always of appreciating that real self that one is rather than a being who merely throws about violence and other negativity about in the arena.
A recognition of who one is, and a reflection on the whole followed by a further reflection of that which one is a part of is essential. After which, one may then reflect of how may one links or how one is interconnected rather than operating as a fragment. In the latter mode, all one does is takes away what suits the subject whilst ignoring others and so although the latter may seemingly give the impression to be authentic, there is an obvious lack as hatred and or the norm of divisions is firmly operational. Likewise, countless others may attempt to con others, giving the impression that they are deriving their force from a synergy of being but indeed all that is being practiced is an attempt to fool others as they are after some designations, or other similar rewards where what is essentially being done is no more than a mere materialising or superficial using of all aspects of relationships or a far cry from a bing in the mode of authenticity who engages and try to create and always try making sense of aspects of materialism where the norm of the material is merely seen as an aspect of the whole rather than making the fragment a way to proceed from.
Or so, is the difference between the two proponents …. of one who brings disunity, lack of respect and or calls for conditional respect, care, or even relationship in this mode and the other which is there seeking to takes its quintessence being from the whole and or is verily a subject of pro activity in action not govern by any sense of operational false ego.
A clear choice: which one one adopts is surely up to the reader to see, perhaps adopts and lives: whilst doing so, what one may come to terms with is precisely seeing that one is no more than either a victim of the material arena or is it possible to rise beyond that realm to clearly see…..Or so, this is the question………