A non-contaminated way of being?

The idea of me-ism is rampant everywhere. That one possess something within the material may itself be not appropriate for one who seeks to attempt negating aspects of the influence of the modes which perpetually attacks being regardless of one’s perceptions. It is impossible to shrug free of the mundane which is around and about and its forces are there to pounce whether engagement in done in any form albeit goodness which verily may be effort gaining praises within the realm of one’s current existent whilst to be sure the mixed modes of the former with passion has its own drawback without having to even comment on the lowest form or its association with the latter where verily a brute form of being emerges.
That life is about a question of shrugging of the mundane which the seers have pronounced may not be taken aboard actually but partially such a mode may be adopted based on one’s idiosyncrasies where all one does is either through reactionary forms adopt partiality of being or takes a lot of the arrogance, envy, hatred and anger from the realm of the material which then gets imposed on the transcendent making the latter a kind of an spurious form of being which observers may witness as a lack of being wondering on the consistency, the kind of natural flow which should be there and about whilst instead what emerges is a truncated form of what the aim or project should be all lost in a wilderness of hatred coupled with an attitude that only the walking authority is that debased self which may be observed generally but for the subject which still feels that all is fine.
The point from this is that the neophyte seeks attempt cheating from the transcendence, where each and every aspect of spirituality is materialised or seen in this term and by so doing gives the proponent an air of credibility from the non material realm. What our comrade fails to realise is that the ways of transcendence is never a fixation at least not in the material realm where the struggle remains and the call is to be at all times actually being in that consciousness away from the norm of the material. It is not an easy process, neither is it that difficult too. It is for one to fine tune that balance in a world where influences are ready around and about to pounce and trample upon the self whether it be from the exterior forces or within one’s mind. The point is to keep alertness of being, a fact which may be done through taking hints of the basics of knowledge and herewith we are referring to non material form of comprehension which is not about a simpleton of reaching that point and being viewed as that but one who is for ever made but rather one who is for ever in the process of being made.
It is an act away from being parochial and or taking any lead from a parrot which merely repeats. It is that act aimed to constantly puts us on par with life as it is from than non material perspective. A kind of full comprehension where the subject understand that one needs to be that extra vigilant and sufficiently diligent not to fall prey or be a victim of the temporal. The point is to move away from that which materialise all aspects of the transcendent but verily makes the latter encompass the former. When this is done, then may one with some satisfaction be able to pronounce that perhaps one is on the way towards comprehension. Or it is never a question of placing the “I” on a pedestal whilst conversely pouring scorn on the other, any other or others. There is a need to take hints that each and every one, regardless of being, status, gender, quality, ability, disability, age and indeed specie are all viewed and need be reaching out with the same fervour and zeal as one approaches one who the subject held in high esteem. Or it is a case is it possible to have this aspect of equanimity in practice where any other is thrown a lifeline regardless. That perhaps is what one needs to aim for, not from a deranged view of being tainted with contamination but where truly not a few, some, or selected others based on citizenships or similar may be given respect. Or respect need be accorded to every other non conditionally. Herein is the test of transcendence and some some preconceived bias of the fragment which denies some others opportunities or where there is a scenario of imposing or trying to impose oneself on others through violence and and or mutilation for the sake that one is viewed as a superior animal. This sense of arrogance gets challenged eventually as nature has its own way of redressing the balance where each Hitler to use an obvious example although had a heyday but eventually crumbles. Likewise, it is incumbent on the self to beware and always be alert less we fall prey to the norm of the divisions when all that one would do would be to take anger and hatred to its peak whilst disengaging with being where all one does is emit aspects of one conditionings with its baggage of non credible way of being and fail to connect or see the grandeur in that which is beyond the form whilst all does is a kind of way which is no more than plain fanaticism in spite of taking shelter in its shade….. where the mundane creeps in.
The challenge being can one shrug free to verily see. If so, what does have have to do to be on par and engage in an authentic way? More importantly, it is a case what does one not have to do? And so arises the question of being again. Can one be in life without being a victim of the temporal and relate, fully actually not from a certain way which forces one into negativism. Is this possible? A challenge which if taken on board may yet leads one from being a transcendental reactionary towards being a transcendental pro-activist.