Seek to understand the other first!

In life it is always a question of that the other lacks in this ,that and the other and the subject moves about and around as if one is complete par excellence: it is the other and always the not me; whereas me, ‘I’ am fine and verily the lack is in the not-me. The subject as such becomes an expert in everything, readily wanting to pounce as and when a lack is noticed.
To be sure, Covey’s dictum from the 5th habit, subject of our blog herewith means little to our comrade as the latter’s intention is verily try to be an expert at everything or let’s say more precisely always seeking to freely throw about one’s advice freely in the mode of seeking to downgrade the other whilst trying to boost oneself. It is called malaise of the temporal where the subject is a free agent, and always looking at any minutiae often irrelevant and or sometimes made up ones in the other as if the subject is free of it. An opinion which one holds dear and throws about as if the subject is free completely from any lack.
This is where the subject of our blog opens up for discussion. Life exposes itself with others around and about in abundance never trying to initially makes sense of and seeks to comprehend the other. Let’s explore this further: What do we mean by saying that one needs to reach out to the other? It is about trying to firstly be appreciative and or reach out in spite of the petty self. Definitely, it is a question of suspending the false ego which feels it owns each and everything towards being sensitive where the other, nay any other is seen as an equal in that the latter is never traumatised and or one always seek to view living from the perspective of always accommodating and never trying to harass the not me but seeing the other as a comrade or living warmth fully and totally rather than being a source of despair to the other.
To be able to appreciative of any other is that which is called cooperation and its opposite is that which may lead into squeezing any other as an enemy to be put down and when this happens the subject is always on an alert and seeking friction whenever and wherever, and arriving from a position of insecurity. Let’s pronounce that the situation of the subject is one of failing to learn and or find any positive. Nothing like this exist in his vocabulary. It is full of negativism and a life built on saliencies of the absurd where all the subject is interested in its own petty self. The other is seen as an object of non-like whoever the other may be. It is all about the petty ego which dominates or rather one wants to see it dominates the agenda. One is as such entangled in a network of hatred and ever anger onto the other with a view that only one knows and the rest a mere mass of objects to be moulded. It is a kind of a repugnant way to be which the subject defends. Criticism is at the basis of its raison d’etre whilst brushing all else and everyone aside. If needs be, for oneself and to gain royalty of purpose where the self is always in promotion whilst trying to pour scorn almost everywhere. The sooner our comrade learns that life does not merely stops with its petty self the better it will be. One needs to awake from the forest of negativism and reach out towards positivism the better it will be for its own being as being battered elsewhere one sense that it is a way where the subject feels it may impose freely on any other.
In the process there is non comprehension about being-ness with the first lesson to be learnt is that one may hardly live without the other or the exercise is very much about connecting with the other in a spirit of positivism rather than its opposite as in the former lies a togetherness of being where there is unity of purpose, without which even our subject is at risk as the way of blatant negativism is about imposing and throwing bouts of hatred, frictions about which merely adds fuel to fire rather than seek towards comprehension. Austerity of speech y is about usage of words that connect and reaches out in the mode of positivism therefore it is always trying to be throw those in the arena which are pleasing, beneficial rather than agitate and create disturbance. It easier to throw babbles and verbosities which causes friction, anger and hatred in trying to led a separatist style of being where it is all about the petty ego in action. The call here is indeed to be appreciate and seek to understand totally, fully completely rather than trying to keep creating tensions about. That one should aim trying to reach out and abide in positivism cannot be more than obvious. The question is: will one caught up in a corrupt way of being, with vibes of negativism be ever free from it to verily see and apprehend rather than impose.
Yet sooner one learns that life is not an isolated or separated affair where it is all about the me, me and me but also about the other and the plurality of others to the extent that makes one almost an insignificant being when face with what is seen around and about. Naturally for our comrade it is all about arrogance from the self which takes precedence over and above any rapport to built. More precisely there is no rapport in the scheme of one who puts a permanent veil about its being and always attempt at plundering of others. Unless one awakes from that malady of hatred, anger and seeing enemies about one will always be in the of despair, hatred, confusion and ignorance of apprehension without which there may never be a success of seeing life as it is but rather a perpetual way of witnessing through a veil of hatred and confusions. The point is to awake, arise and perceive as it is. That is the challenge!